Environmental Justice Data and
Mapping Tools to Advance the Movement
On July 9–11, I attended the Environmental Justice Data and Mapping Symposium organized by FracTracker Alliance in Houston, Texas. The purpose of the event was to bring together researchers, community advocates, and practitioners to really think about how to respond to this current moment when it comes to the documentation, preservation, and maintenance of existing environmental justice data and mapping tools like EJScreen and the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), as well as the development of tools that can advance the movement.
As a representative of Front and Centered, I connected with other organizations who also use research, data, and mapping to advance environmental justice and climate justice advocacy so that we could think through how we might share resources and lessons learned across regions.
Impactful Sessions
What is land back without restoration of land?
The question above was posed to us in one of the workshops I attended (“Initiating Collaborative Community, from Archiving Projects to Environmental Health Governance”) by Thomas De Pree, Research Assistant Professor from the University of New Mexico, when he was talking about pollution in New Mexico. In the state, there are huge disparities in environmental cleanup between white and Indigenous/Latine communities. For instance, a nuclear testing plume in New Mexico followed the Spanish colonization route and resulted in the Church Rock uranium mill spill in the late 1980s. Even though there hasn’t been uranium mining in New Mexico since the 1990s, waste and tailings still remain and impact groundwater, with three plumes entering Rio San Jose.
There is still ongoing resistance to the spill and commemoration by Diné people today. De Pree talked about the need for baselining—a common understanding between stakeholders (like governments, communities, and corporations) of what the “baseline” is for restoration and cleanup. UNM, the Multicultural Alliance for Safe Environment, and others used photo essays, presentations, and communications strategies to engage and document cleanups. They are gathering oral histories and testimonies from the spill with the Southwest Research and Information Center; those histories will be housed in a digital archive at a library in the Church Rock community. All that is to say: land and people are interconnected in their needs for protection and preservation.
In another session called, “Community Science Perspectives” led by Sacoby Wilson (Director for the Center for Engagement, Environmental Justice, and Health at the University of Maryland) discussed environmental justice science,and highlighted the importance of our work being grounded in EJ principles. A term Wilson that proposed and that I will continue to reflect on was “inpowerment”—the idea that science’s role is to build capacity, critical literacy, agency, and connection to power for community. Furthermore, Wilson said that to make change we need to focus on the types of communications that reach policymakers—e.g. white papers, briefs, and infographics versus longer reports, academic articles, and so on—and to be in the room where decisions are made. This felt particularly resonant to Front and Centered’s mission and my work.
In “Lessons Learned from the Proliferation of Tools,” Matthew Tejada underlined the importance of EJ screening tools while advocating for critical thought in their use. Tejada, the Senior Vice President of Environmental Health at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said that while tools like EJScreen and the Washington State Environmental Health Disparities Map can help us begin to understand what’s happening on the ground, we need to understand their uses and limitations as we should with any other quantitative data tool.
The Most Important Things I Learned
I came away from the Environmental Justice Data and Mapping Symposium thinking not only about how we are doing a lot with data and mapping, but also about how there is so much more to do and learn when it comes to environmental justice data and mapping tools. My main takeaways are:
- There are a lot of strategies we could learn from the Gulf Coast states in particular, as frontline communities on a national scale.
- Investment in regional/local tools, as well as community-owned data systems, are only going to become more important as we continue our work while continuing despite waning federal support.
Tools and Resources
Below are some of the tools and resources I found especially interesting that others may be interested in:
- Air Alliance Houston Airmail Program
- Oil and Gas Watch (Environmental Integrity Project)
- Carbon Capture, Use, and Sequestration Tools (Environmental Integrity Project
- FracTracker’s work on tracking data centers and crypto mines
- Houston’s Dirty Dozen: A Report on the Top Industrial Air Polluters (Air Alliance Houston)
- Environmental Justice Data Action Portal (Deep South Center for Environmental Justice)
- Environmental Justice Data Action Portal (Deep South Center for Environmental Justice)
- Flood Factor Flood Risk Tool
- The Community Guide to Cumulative Impacts (Union of Concerned Scientists)
There are a lot of strategies we could learn from the Gulf Coast states in particular, as frontline communities on a national scale.